Amar Kumar Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.25372 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -14 Year- 2016 Thana -JAMUI District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Amar Kumar Yadav, Son of Baidyanath Yadav

2. Karan Kumar Yadav Son of Bala Yadav Both resident of Village- Gera Bari, P.S. Kodha, District- Katihar.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners is that on the point of pistol they snatched cash amount of Rs. 15,000/- from the informant.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they are in custody since 2.3.2016. Chargesheet has been submitted against the petitioners. No allegation of tampering of witnesses is alleged against the petitioners. Petitioners have been made accused due to mistake of fact. There is no recovery of any incriminating article from the possession of the petitioners. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that petitioners are named in the F.I.R. On chase by the police, petitioners were apprehended. From their possession arms along with looted amount of Rs 15,000/- is said to have been recovered. The recovery of the looted amount along with arms has been seized in connection with Town P.S. Case no. 15 of 2016. Both cases relate to the same occurrence. Apart from that there is one more case for

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25372 of 2016 (4) dt.09-08-2016 2/2 offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage, same is rejected.

(Sudhir Singh, J) sudip/- U T