Jitendra Kumar Sah @ Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Kumar Saw v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18886 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2024 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Nawada ====================================================== Jitendra Kumar Sah @ Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Kumar Saw Son of Baro Sah @ Badho Sao Resident of village - Fatha, P.S. - Warisaliganj, District - Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 07-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 81 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2), 318(2), 318(4), 338, 319(2), 336(2), 336(3), 340(2), 111, 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 read with Sections 66, 66(b), 66(c) and 66(d) of I.T. Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, on secret information the police conducted raid at village Fatha and upon seeing them the petitioner along with other co-accused persons tried to flee from the spot but was apprehended by the police. It is further alleged that a mobile phone and 3 pages of data sheet have been recovered from the possession of this petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18886 of 2025(2) dt.07-04-2025 2/2 present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the recovered mobile phone belongs to the petitioner and he has got no concern with the recovery of data sheets. It is further submitted that the petitioner was a passerby of that way and was arrested on the basis of suspicion. The petitioner is a handicapped person suffering from 45% disability. The petitioner is in custody since 30.12.2024 and has got no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 81 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T