Md. Israfil Ansari @ Mohd. Israfil v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL REVISION No.1013 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-1111 Thana- District- ====================================================== Md. Israfil Ansari @ Mohd. Israfil son of Md. Shahadat Ansari @ Mohd. Shahdat, resident of Village- Khiripadhar, P.S. Barahat, District- Banka. At Present resident of Hindustan Compound Jajmau, Shiwans Tenray, P.S. Kanpur State Uttar Pradesh.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Bibi Sahavi Khatoon, wife of Md. Israfil Ansari @ Mohd. Israfi resident of Village- Khiripadhar, P.O. Auoriya, P.S. Barahat, District- Banka. At Present Address- Daughter of Md. Nasir Ansari, resident of Village- Dahua, P.S. Banka, District- Banka.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Md. Ashlam Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 27-07-2022 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner once again to press this application. On 15.07.2022 finding that no one was appearing for the petitioner this Court had adjourned the matter by way of an indulgence.

This case is of the year 2018 and it relates to the maintenance of the wife who is opposite party before this Court. A perusal of the impugned judgment shows that the applicantwife has been allowed a maintenance allowance of Rs. 2000/- per month against which the petitioner has moved this Court. Considering that there are clinching materials showing that the petitioner has performed a second Nikah and is

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.1013 of 2018(3) dt.27-07-2022 2/2 living with his second wife with whom he has got a female child also, whereas he is neglecting this opposite party, this Court finds that no interference is required to the impugned order. The learned court below has allowed only a meagre amount of Rs. 2000/- per month which cannot be said to be excessive in the present days economic condition and the price index of the country.

This revision application has, thus, no merit. It is dismissed accordingly.

The learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Banka is directed to expedite the process of recovery from the petitioner. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J.) Rajeev/- U T Note: The ordersheet duly signed has been attached with the record. However, in view of the present arrangements, during Pandemic period all concerned shall act on the basis of the copy of the order uploaded on the High Court website under the heading 'Judicial Orders Passed During The Pandemic Period'.