Sher Ali v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51017 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -14 Year- 2018 Thana -JANTA BAZAR District- SARAN ====================================================== Sher Ali S/o Subrati R/o Village- Jalalpur Borion, P.S. Pokhraj, District Koshambi, U.P.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nawal Kishore Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bisheshwar Ram, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Janta Bazar P.S. Case No. 14/2018, registered for the offences punishable under Section 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is alleged that petitioner and co-accused stolen the motorcycle of informant and started fleeing away. On chase, one accused was apprehended with the said motorcycle, who disclosed the name of petitioner.

It has been submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession.

Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He is in custody since 29.01.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51017 of 2018 (2) dt.03-10-2018 2/2 Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ist, Saran at Chapra in connection with Janta Bazar P.S. Case No. 14/2018, subject to the conditions: (1.) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2.) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bonds.

(3.) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Vinita/- U T