Patna High CourtCR. MISC./52086/2018disposed

Mintu Kumar @ Mirtunjay Kumar Singh @ Mirtunjay Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-04Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.52086 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-160 Year-2018 Thana- BIKRAMGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== MINTU KUMAR @ MIRTUNJAY KUMAR SINGH @ MIRTUNJAY SINGH S/o Late Visun Singh, R/o vill.- Golapa P.S.- Bikramganj, DistrictRohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhaneshwar Prasad Gupta For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Pranav Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 160 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a and 26 of the Arms Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of one Pistol and two live cartridges.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has committed no offence and has been implicated in this case on suspicion. Petitioner is in custody since 15.05.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52086 of 2018(2) dt.04-10-2018 2/2 after completing six month of custody in jail, upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Bikramganj, in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 160 of 2018, with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U