← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40185/2014dismissed

Ratnakar Kumar @ Babloo Rai v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2015-03-13Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 40185 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -108 Year- 2014 Thana -KOILWAR District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== Ratnakar Kumar @ Babloo Rai, Son of Lalan Rai, Resident of villageBirampur, P.S.- Koilwar, District- Bhojpur. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Rubi Devi, Wife of Ratnakar Kumar Rai @ Babloo Rai, Resident of village- Birampur, P.S.- Koilwar, District- Patna, recently residing at D/o Musafir Chaudhary, Resident of village- Jamuaon, P.S. - Sandesh, District- Bhojpur.

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vibhuti Ranjan Sonvadra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kr.Singh(App) Mr. Ravindra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2.

13-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor as well as Sri Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel, who has voluntarily appeared on behalf of informant. The petitioner, who is husband of informant/opposite party no. 2, apprehending his arrest in Koilwar P.S. Case No. 108 of 2014 registered for the offence under Sections 498(A), 494, 341, 323, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, has prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.

At the very outset, Sri Vibhuti Ranjan Sonvadra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to keep the opposite party no. 2 respectfully as wife,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40185 of 2014 (2) dt.13-03-2015 2/2 however; learned counsel for the informant, while opposing the prayer for anticipatory bail, submits that the petitioner has already solemnized second marriage and as such, there is no question for keeping opposite party no. 2 as wife.

In view of the aforesaid fact, I do not find any ground to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail. The petition stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay/- U T