Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33222/2016bail granted

Rohit Kumar Das @ Rohit Das v. The State Of Bihar

2016-08-23Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.33222 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -510 Year- 2015 Thana -KISHANGANJ District- KISANGANJ ====================================================== Rohit Kumar Das @ Rohit Das Son of Late Sahdev Das resident of Village- Halim Chauk, Police Station- KishanganJ in the district of Kishanganj .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Vijay Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 23-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 02.01.2016 in connection with Kishanganj P.S. Case No. 510 of 2015, for the offences alleged under Sections 364(A) and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated owing to previous enmity between the parties. Save and except statement of the so-called victim, there is no other material to connect the petitioner with the offence alleged, as the victim was not recovered from the petitioner or from his house. Similarly situated co-accused Prakash Paul @ Prakash Pal has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 15659 of 2016.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33222 of 2016 (2) dt.23-08-2016

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj in connection with Kishanganj P.S. Case No. 510 of 2015, G.R. No. 2019 of 2015 with the following conditions:

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/Chandran U T