Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19032/2025bail granted

Md. Chunna @ Ejaj @ Md. Ejaj @ Chunna v. The State Of Bihar

2025-06-17Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19032 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-111 Year-2024 Thana- BHARGAMA District- Araria ====================================================== Md. Chunna @ Ejaj @ Md. Ejaj @ Chunna Son of Nasiruddin R/o- Laxmipur Bhagwati, Ward No. 10 P.S.- Sri Nagar, Distt.- Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gajanan Mishra, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Naresh Ray, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with S.Tr. No. 768/24 arising out of Bhargama P.S. Case No. 111 of 2024 dated 20.04.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 399, 402, 414, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26, 35 and 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, two country made pistols one live cartridge and one empty cartridge were recovered from the possession of the co-accused, Md. Sakir. One motorcycle was also recovered from the place of occurrence.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19032 of 2025(2) dt.17-06-2025 2/2 case. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in the confessional statement of the co-accused, Md. Sakir. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The co-accused person has already been granted regular bail by this court vide order dated 26.10.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 61360/2024. The petitioner has three criminal antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 30.10.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Araria in connection with S.Tr. No. 768/2024 arising out of Bhargama P.S. Case No. 111 of 2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T