Rajnandan Mistry v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28695 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-69 Year-2020 Thana- CHHABILAPUR District- Nalanda ====================================================== RAJNANDAN MISTRY S/O SARYUG MISTRI R/o village- Kahta, P.S.- Chhabilapur, District- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Raj Kishor Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-08-2021 This matter is taken up for consideration through Video Conferencing.
Heard both parties.
The petitioner seeks bail in Chhabilpur P.S. Case No. 69 of 2020, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a/26 of the Arms Act.
As per the prosecution case, one country made pistol and two live cartridges have been recovered from possession of this petitioner.
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of this petitioner and he has been arrested by the police merely on suspicion. Petitioner is in custody since 09.10.2020. Chargesheet has already been submitted.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28695 of 2021(2) dt.09-08-2021 2/2 Considering the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate V, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Chhabilapur P.S. Case No. 69 of 2020, subject to following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below. (ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T