Patna High CourtCR. MISC./58819/2017bail granted

Mukesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-01-09Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.58819 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -225 Year- 2017 Thana -TRIVENIGANJ District- SUPAUL ======================================================

1. Mukesh Kumar, son of Sanjay Yadav, resident of Village- Daparakha, Ward No. 11, Tola- Bisanpur, P.S.- Triveniganj, District- Supaul. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Naresh Ray ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner is in custody in connection with Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 225 of 2017, a case under Section 366/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

According to the F.I.R., the petitioner and others have kidnapped the daughter of the informant. The victim stated before the police that she had love affair with the petitioner. Hence, she voluntarily left the house. However, in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. she alleged kidnapping against the petitioner. It appears that similarly situated co-accused Pramod Kumar has already been allowed bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 52494 of 2017.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58819 of 2017 (3) dt.09-01-2018 2/2 Considering the aforesaid fact, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with Triveniganj Police Station Case No. 225 of 2017 with condition that the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (Birendra Kumar, J) sushma/- U T