Nutan Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20882 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-777 Year-2021 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura ====================================================== 1.

NUTAN KUMARI W/o Bikram Kumar Resident of Village- Sahugarh Tola Janki Ward No.3, P.S.- Madhepura, District- Madhepura. 2.

Soni Devi @ Khushboo Kumari W/o Manish Kumar Resident of VillageSahugarh Tola, Janki Ward No.-3, P.S.- Madhepura, District- Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kamal Kishore Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Kishore Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 01-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 341, 323, 307, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 25(a-b)a, 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and are women and the informant alleges that Rajendra Sah and Vikram Sah opened fire causing injury on the person of Roshan and Prabhakar, thereafter the other accused persons including the petitioners assaulted the informant by lathi, bhala and farsa causing injury and also took out Rs. 50,000/- and ornaments from the house of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20882 of 2022(2) dt.01-11-2022 2/2 informant.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that there is specific allegation of firing against the named accused persons and the petitioners being related to the accused persons have been falsely implicated when there is no specific allegation against them.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No. 777 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Shivam/- U T