Umesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32821 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1 Year- 2016 Thana -BHOJPUR GRP CASE District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== Umesh Yadav son of Late Lallan Yadav resident of Village- Mathila Dera, P.S. - Karan Sarai, District- Buxar .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Surendra Kumar Singh, Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 16-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 03.01.2016 in connection with Buxar Rail P.S. Case No. 01 of 2016 for the offences alleged under Sections 399, 402 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1b)a, 26 and 36 of the Arms Act.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and except recovery of two cartridges and mobile phone from the pocket of the petitioner, no other incriminating goods have been recovered from his possession.

4. Having regard to the period of custody of the above named petitioner, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Ara in connection with Buxar Rail P.S. Case No. 01 of 2016, with the following condition:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32821 of 2016 (2) dt.16-08-2016 2/2 petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner shall remain physically present on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure to do so on three consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) B.T/Chandran U T