Sajan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.63612 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -210 Year- 2017 Thana -KHAIRA District- JAMUI ====================================================== Sajan Kumar, Son of Raj Kumar Das, Resident of VillageMohanpur, P.S.-Laxmipur, District-Jamui. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rabi Bhushan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Kalyan Shankar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 2.
10-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
Petitioner, in the present case, is seeking regular bail in connection with Khaira P.S. Case No. 210 of 2017 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been remanded in this case after he was arrested in connection with Khaira P.S. Case No. 269/2017. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. being Khaira P.S. Case No. 210/2017 under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. He further submits that neither the police has got
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.63612 of 2017 (2) dt.10-01-2018 conducted the T.I. parade nor there is any recovery of goods or articles allegedly looted, and therefore, there is absolutely no material to connect him with the present case. It is submitted that the police relies upon a confessional statement allegedly extracted from this petitioner. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case particularly that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and till date no T.I. parade has been conducted to connect him in the present case, as also save and except the case in which he had been arrested one day ago, the petitioner had no other case on his head, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui, in connection with Khaira P.S. Case No. 210/2017, subject to condition as laid down under Section 437(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and further condition that petitioner will appear before the trial/court
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.63612 of 2017 (2) dt.10-01-2018 on each and every date and failure to appear on two consecutive dates without assigning any reason will entail cancellation of his bail bonds.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J.) Rajeev/- U T