← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19395/2022allowed

Murari Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-08-23Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19395 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2021 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== 1.

Murari Yadav Son Of Late Anik Yadav @ Anik Yadav Resident Of Village - Chandwara, Pachmma, P.S.- Muffasil, Singhaul O.P., District - Begusarai. 2.

Raja Kumar @ Rajan Kumar Son Of Murari Yadav Resident Of Village - Chandwara, Pachmma, P.S.- Muffasil, Singhaul O.P., District - Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. H.A. Khan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 23-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case due to land dispute. He submits that there

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19395 of 2022(2) dt.23-08-2022 2/2 is case and counter case between the parties and both sides have sustained injury. He submits that the injury found upon the victim is simple in nature. He further submits that petitioner no. 1 has three criminal antecedent and petitioner no. 2 has one criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that no injury has been found upon the victim, the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 39 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T