← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4786/2025dismissed

Shivjee Prasad v. The Union Of India

2025-04-03Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4786 of 2025 ====================================================== Shivjee Prasad S/o Late Sita Ram Mahto, Resident of Mohalla-Bansh Kothi, Gate No.-95, P.O. and P.S.-Digha, District-Patna, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through the Secretary, Department of Land Resources, Government of India, New Delhi.

2.

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. 3.

The District Magistrate cum Collector, Patna. 4.

The Additional Collector, District-Patna.

5.

The Superintendent of Police, Patna.

6.

The D.C.L.R., Patna Sadar, Patna.

7.

The Sub-Diivisional Officer, Patna Sadar, Patna. 8.

The Circle Officer, Patna Sadar Anchal, District-Patna. 9.

The Pricipal, I.T.I. Digha, District-Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satya Prakash Sinha For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Additional Solicitor General ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 03-04-2025 Heard the parties.

2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the order vide Memo no. 9603, dated 21.10.2024 issued by the Circle Officer, Patna Sadar, District - Patna by which he has directed the Anchal Amin to do measurement of the land bearing the Khata No. 739, Khesra No. 4669, 4670 and 4672 including other lands situated in Mauza-Digha, Banshkothi, Ambedkar Colony, Patna without proper verification of the land records since the petitioner is a khatiyani

Patna High Court CWJC No.4786 of 2025(2) dt.03-04-2025 2/2 raiyat of the land. (Annexure-P-3).

3. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of Circle Officer, Patna Sadar whereby he directed the Anchal Amin to get the land in question measured.

4. I do not find any merit in this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/- U