Kalu Paswan @ Mukesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19404 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-75 Year-2021 Thana- DELHA District- Gaya ====================================================== Kalu Paswan @ Mukesh Kumar Son of Rajkumar Paswan @ Ambika Paswan Resident of Mohalla - Kharkhura Paswan Toli, P.S.- Delha, District - Gaya. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ravindra Kumar Sinha, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 20-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Delha P.S. Case No. 75 of 2021 lodged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 353, 307, 333 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per the prosecution case, it has been informed to the police that some persons are trying to disturb the peace and public tranquility by making noise through D.J. The police administration reached there and asked them to stop on which the accused persons attacked on police personnel who were on patrolling duty in which one Constable became injured, in result the present case was filed.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19404 of 2022(2) dt.20-07-2022 2/3 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petitioner is peace loving and law abiding person. The entire case has been lodged on the secret information. There is nothing specific against anyone rather a general and omnibus allegation was made in the F.I.R. against all the 17 named accused persons. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no criminal antecedent of the petitioner and he is in judicial custody since 09.08.2021 and charge sheet has already been filed in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that a co-accused, namely, Uttam Sao @ Raushan Sao has already been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 18.04.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No.49708 of 2021.
Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, let the petitioner above named, be granted bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Delha P.S. Case No. 75 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19404 of 2022(2) dt.20-07-2022 3/3 With this observation, the bail application stands allowed.
(Dr. Anshuman, J.) ritik/- U T