Bablu Gopal Singh @ Babloo Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19305 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-791 Year-2021 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran ====================================================== Bablu Gopal Singh @ Babloo Singh Son Of Mritunjay Kumar Singh R/O - Mukrera, P.S.- Rivilganj, Didstrict- Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ayush Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Md. Ataur Rahman, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 17-08-2022 Let the defect, if any, be removed within two weeks from today.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 791 of 2021 lodged under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.
The allegation in the prosecution case is against 6 unknown criminals against whom the allegation of dacoity is there.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. rather his name has figured in this case by virtue of confessional statement of Sonu Kumar. The negative aspect of his case is that recovery of snatched
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19305 of 2022(3) dt.17-08-2022 2/3 motorcycle has been made from the possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that petitioner is in custody since 29.11.2021 and chargesheet has already been filed in this case. On the point of his criminal antecedent, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are 3 cases pending against him, out of 3 cases, in 1 case he is on bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that petitioner is also ready to fulfill all the conditions, whatsoever shall be imposed upon him by the Court.
Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that looted motorcycle has been recovered from the house of the petitioner and, therefore, bail may not be granted to him. He further submits that petitioner is accused in 3 cases, out of 3 cases, 2 cases belongs to dacoity/ robbery. In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage and, therefore, his bail application is hereby rejected.
Liberty is hereby granted to the petitioner to make prayer for bail after two months of framing of charge. Speedy trial is the Constitutional vision of justice, it has been informed at Bar that petitioner is accused in Sonepur
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19305 of 2022(3) dt.17-08-2022 3/3 P.S. Case No. 181 of 2012, Rivilganj P.S. Case No. 163 of 2021, Ekma P.S. Case No. 161 of 2021 and Garkha P.S. Case No. 791 of 2021 (present one). All the 4 cases are related to the same district i.e. District Saran at Chapra. With a view to make the speedy trial, the District and Session Judge, Chapra is directed to put all the 4 cases before one Magistrate who shall put one date in all the cases and after commitment trial of all session triable case may run before one Session Court. Let the copy of this order is also forwarded to the District and Session Judges, Saran at Chhapra for compliance. With this observation, the bail application stands rejected.
(Dr. Anshuman, J.) ritik/- U T