← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39823/2014rejected

Ramanand Mahto @ Ramanand Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2015-03-20Justice Smt. Anjana Prakash2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.39823 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -35 Year- 2014 Thana -JAYNAGAR District- MADHUBANI ======================================================

1. Ramanand Mahto @ Ramanand Singh S/o Jagdeo Mahto

2. Babita Devi W/o Ramanand Mahto

3. Bhaskar Mahto S/o Ramanand mahto All are resident of VillageBaitaunha, P.S. - Jainagar, District- Madhubani. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Murari Narain Chaudhary, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kr.Virendra Narayan, App ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 20-03-2015 Considering the nature of allegation against the petitioner nos. 1 and 3, I am not inclined to grant them anticipatory bail. Prayer for bail is rejected.

However, without going into the merits of the case, the petitioner no. 2 being a lady, in the event of surrender/arrest within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Jainagar P.S. Case No. 35 of 2014/G.R. No. 600 of 2014, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court below to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani subject to the conditions as laid down under sections 438(2) Cr. P. C.

That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39823 of 2014 (2) dt.20-03-2015 2/2 how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and, if he is, he shall not be released on bail, That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse.

That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J) Prakash/- U T