Ramveer Kumar @ Ram Ranjan Singh @ Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19537 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-99 Year-2022 Thana- NOWKOTHI GARHPURA DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== RAMVEER KUMAR @ RAM RANJAN SINGH @ RANJAN KUMAR SON OF ANIL SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - DAFFARPUR WEST, WARD NO. 5, P.S. - NOW KOTHI, DISTT. - BEGUSARAI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sabal Kumar Jha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 12-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Naw Kothi P.S. Case No. 99 of 2022 registered for the offence under Sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code and later on charge sheet has been submitted under Section 392 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Three unidentified miscreants are alleged to have committed loot with the informant on the point of pistol and taken away his motorcycle and his belongings. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner has not been named in the F.I.R., however, his name transpired in this case on the basis of self confessional statement of the petitioner which

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19537 of 2023(3) dt.12-07-2023 2/3 was recorded in connection with Naw Kothi P.S. Case No. 107 of 2022. He further submits that the police found some belonging of the informant from the rented house of the petitioner, which is a open place. He further submits that there is non-compliance of Section 100 of the Cr.P.C. and the place of recovery does not belong to the petitioner rather the owner of the said place in question is one Kari Singh @ Arun Singh, who happens to be the seizure witness. No T.I.P. has been conducted by the prosecution till date. He further submits that the police after investigation has submitted charge-sheet in this case against the petitioner. The petitioner is rotting in judicial custody since 20.10.2022. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner carries two more cases other than the present one.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the, above named, petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Begusarai in connection with Naw Kothi P.S. Case No. 99 of 2022 with the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19537 of 2023(3) dt.12-07-2023 3/3 reason, his/her bail bond shall be canceled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) brajesh/- U T