Shivshakti Agri Products And Rice Industries Pvt. Ltd. And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11033 of 2015 ====================================================== 1.

Shivshakti Agri Products and Rice Industries Pvt. Ltd. and Anr at Ward No. 13, Mauze Raxaul, P.O. and P.S. - Raxaul, District - East Champaran. 2.

Ashok Kumar Sinha s/o Late Shivbachan Prasad resident of Ward No. 13, Mauze Raxaul, P.O. and P.S. - Raxaul, District - East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.

Department of Revenue and Land Reforms through its Principal Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Department of Finance through its Principal Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.

Department of Energy through its Principal Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 5.

The Bihar State Power Holding Corporation Ltd., Patna through the General Manager-cum-Chief Engine 6.

General Manager Human Resource/Administration, Bihar State Power Holding Corporation Ltd., Patna 7.

The General Manager-cum-Chief Engnieer, Transmission Area, Muzaffarur 132/33 KV Grid S/S Campus, Bh 8.

The Commissioner Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 9.

The Collector, East Champaran at Motihari.

10.

The Circle Officer, Raxaul East Champaran at Raxaul. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None.

For the State/s :

Mr. Mahendra Prasad Verma, AC to SC-20 For the Respondent No.7 :

Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, Sr. Adv.

:

Mr. Akhileshwar Singh, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 10-08-2023 Upon repeated call, no one appears on behalf of the petitioners, however, Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, learned Senior counsel with Mr. Akhileshwar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent No. 7 and counsel for the State are present.

2. Vide order dated 31.07.2023, it transpires that on

Patna High Court CWJC No.11033 of 2015(3) dt.10-08-2023 2/2 the said date also, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners and case has been adjourned as a matter of last indulgence.

3. Today also, no one appears on behalf of the petitioners. As such, it transpires to this Court that petitioners are not interested to pursue this matter.

4. In this view of the matter, this writ application is hereby dismissed due to non-prosecution.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) prakashmani/- U