← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/5547/2023dismissed

Girja Devi v. The Union Of India

2023-08-22Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5547 of 2023 ====================================================== Girja Devi W/o Late Dashrath Ram R/o Vill.- Jani Bazar Sasaram, at present residing R/o Mohalla- Jagdev nagar Bouliya Ward No.- 24, P.S.- Sasaram, District- Rohtas at Sasaram.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through the Under Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs New Delhi.

2.

The Home Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram.

4.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sasaram.

5.

The Executive Magistrate, Sasaram, District- Rohtas. 6.

The Block Development Officer, Sasaram, Dist.- Rohtas. 7.

The Circle Officer, Circle Sasaram, District- Rohtas at Sasaram. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ramanuj Tiwary, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Ghosarvey, Advocate For the Union of India :

Mrs. Punam Kumari Singh, C.G.C.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 22-08-2023 1.

The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That this is an application on behalf of above named petitioner for issuance appropriate writ(s)/ order (s)/direction quashing of vide Letter No. 2-11011/15/2020- FF-CZ (B) dated 06.03.2023 issued by the Under Secretary to Government of India by which direction has been issued to the Assistant General

Patna High Court CWJC No.5547 of 2023(3) dt.22-08-2023 2/2 Manager, Central Bank of India, M.G. Road Hutatma Chowk Fort, Mumbai for suspension of Freedom Fighter Pension of petitioner w.e.f.

06.03.2023 (Annexure-14).

Further direction has been issued to Respondents to initiate the Dependent Family Pension to the petitioner.

And or any other reliefs as per the fact and circumstance of the case."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, for redressal of the aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U