Chintu Kumar @ Vishwas Kumar @ Chintu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19772 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-153 Year-2025 Thana- DARBHANGA District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Chintu Kumar @ Vishwas Kumar @ Chintu Son of Gopal Ram Resident of Village- Ram Chowk, Ward No. 7, P.S.- Town, District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

X Son of Chote Chaudhary Resident of Village- Ram Chowk, Panchanath Gali, P.S.- Town, District- Darbhanga.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Virendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 24-06-2026 In spite of service of notice and sufficient opportunity, no one is present on behalf of O.P. No. 2.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

3. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 153 of 2025, instituted under Sections 127(2), 76, 109, 351(2), 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 8, 12 of the POCSO Act.

4. As per the prosecution case, minor daughter of the informant was abducted by the petitioner along with F.I.R. named accused persons when she had gone to toilet.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Town P.S. Case No. 156 of 2025 has been lodged against the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19772 of 2026(4) dt.24-06-2026 2/2 informant and others and this case is lodged as counter blast. There is no allegation of any sexual assault against the petitioner. The petitioner and daughter of informant like to each other and used to meet due to which this case has been lodged by the informant. Similarly situated one co-accused has been granted regular bail and two have been granted anticipatory bail by the Court concerned. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He undertakes to co-operate in the investigation and trial.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submission of learned counsel for the parties and clean antecedent of the petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge (POCSO Act), Darbhanga/Concerned Court in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 153 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.), 2023.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J.) rakhi/- U T