Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39621/2014bail granted

Hare Ram Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2015-03-19Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.39621 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -150 Year- 2014 Thana -ITADHI District- BUXAR ======================================================

1. Hare Ram Yadav Son of Late Ramashraya Yadav @ Kutur Yadav

2. Sajit Yadav Son of Hare RamYadav Both resident of Village - Kawal Pokhara, Police Station - Itarhi, District- Buxar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar,Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 19-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 307/34 IPC registered in connection with Itarhi P.S. Case No. 150 of 2014.

3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated owing to village disputes. The accusations are general and omnibus against the two persons said to have committed the assault. At any rate, the injuries are said to be simple in nature and the petitioners are having clean antecedents.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39621 of 2014 (2) dt.19-03-2015 circumstances of the case, in the event of the petitioners arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar, in connection with Itarhi P.S. Case No. 150 of 2014subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:

(i) The petitioners shall cooperate with the investigation and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(ii) The petitioners shall remain physically present as and when required during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran U T