← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./55994/2017bail granted

Monu Kumar Gupta @ Monu Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-28Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.55994 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -246 Year- 2017 Thana -KATEYA District- GOPALGANJ ======================================================

1. MONU KUMAR GUPTA @ MONU KUMAR, S/o Late Lagan Gupta,

2. Bhola Gond, S/o Prakash Gond, Both residents of Village- Sahganj Padrouna, P.S.- Padrouna, DistrictKushinagar U.P. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashhar Mustafa For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER 28-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Petitioners seek bail in connection with Kataiya P.S. Case No. 246/2017 for offences punishable under Sections 420, 414, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act.

The prosecution case, as lodged by the police personnel, is that on a secret tip off the unnumbered Bolero Pickup Van of the petitioner coming from U.P. to Bihar, was apprehended and from the van 40 sacks each containing 30-35 packets of food items was found, for which the petitioners did not submit any papers. They revealed that the van did not belong to

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55994 of 2017 (2) dt.28-11-2017 2/3 them and the food items belonged to one Pintu Kumar Jaiswal. Accordingly, a seizure-list was prepared.

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that they are innocent, bear no criminal history, they were driver and conductor of the said van respectively and were unaware that the food items were being carried for blackmarketing. He submits that Section 7 of the E.C. Act is not applicable against them and they are languishing in custody since 26.08.2017.

However, learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances and the materials on record, let petitioners, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj, in connection with Kataiya P.S. Case No. 246 of 2017, subject to the following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors would be a close relative of the petitioners having sufficient immovable property, who will file an affidavit stating his relationship with the petitioners.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55994 of 2017 (2) dt.28-11-2017 3/3 (ii) If the petitioners indulge in an offence of similar nature in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to move the learned court below for cancellation of their bail bonds. (Nilu Agrawal, J) Rajesh/- U T