Om Prakash Yadav @ Om Prakash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21781 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-80 Year-2023 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Supaul ====================================================== Om Prakash Yadav @ Om Prakash Kumar Son of Bindeshwari Yadav R/VLokaha ward no. 2, P.S- Bhaptiahi, Dist- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Hriday Narayan Harshit For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Sangeeta Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-05-2023 Heard Ld. counsel for the petitioner and Ld. APP for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Madhnishedh Supaul P. S. Case No. 80 of 2023, registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act.
As per allegation, 300 liters of liquor has been recovered from two motorcycles.
Ld. counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case due to village politics. He also submits that during the course of investigation, no witnesses have supported the
2/4 prosecution case.
He further submits that the petitioner has been languishing in jail since 05.02.2023.
It has also been stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one.
However, Ld. APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the petitioner for bail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this application is allowed, directing the petitioner, abovenamed, to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Ld. A.D.J.-Vcum-Spl. Judge Excise Act, Supaul, District Supaul, in connection with Madhnishedh Supaul P. S. Case No. 80 of 2023 on the following conditions:
(i) The petitioner will make himself available for interrogation by a police officer/court as and when required.
3/4 (ii) The petitioner will undertake that investigation/trial will not get hampered on account of his absence or non-cooperation. He must be available to the police or the court whenever his presence is required. (iii) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer.
(iv) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedents, Ld. court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the same.
(v) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, Ld. court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
(vi) In case, the petitioner repeats offence of
4/4 similar nature after enlargement on bail, his bail-bond will be cancelled by the court below.
Ld. counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects, if any, pointed out by the office within a period of one month and the Registry is directed to issue the certified copy of this order only after removal of office objections.
(Jitendra Kumar, J) skm/- U T