Bikram Raj @ Vikko Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20970 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-542 Year-2018 Thana- KHAGARIA DistrictKhagaria ====================================================== Bikram Raj @ Vikko Yadav, aged about 24 years, male, Son of Lalo Yadav Resident of Village- Mourkahi, Hatwan, P.S.- Alauli, District- Khagaria. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Shekhar Kumar Singh, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party:

APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 04-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act registered in connection with Khagaria P.S. Case No. 542 of 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. Petitioner's name has transpired only on the extra judicial confessional statement of co-accused Sagun Yadav, except which there is no other material to connect the petitioner with the alleged occurrence. F.I.R. named accused Kiro Yadav has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 74616 of 2018. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20970 of 2019(2) dt.04-04-2019 2/2 Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Khagaria P.S. Case No. 542 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions - (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T