Subodh Sah @ Suman Kumar @ Chpti v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19318 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2022 Thana- BANGARA District- Samastipur ====================================================== SUBODH SAH @ SUMAN KUMAR @ CHPTI S/o Late Rajdev Sah @ Raju Sah, R/o village- Dharmagatpur Bathua, P.S.- Pusa, District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Aprajita, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 12-08-2022 Let the defect, if any, be removed within two weeks from today.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State through virtual mode.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Bangara P.S. Case No. 12 of 2022 lodged under Sections 414, 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. His name has figured in this case only due to the reason that there are four cases pending against him. He further submits that petitioner is in custody since 02.02.2022. He further submits that on the point of his criminal antecedent, he is ready to fulfill all the conditions whatsoever shall be imposed upon him.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19318 of 2022(3) dt.12-08-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioner's criminal antecedent is bad and he was in habit of selling trucks by creating forged and fabricated papers of the same. Case diary was called for and charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. In the present facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. Accordingly, the bail petition of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

Petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge in this case.

With this observation, the bail application is rejected. (Dr. Anshuman, J.) ravishankar/- U T