Ramu Yadav @ Jitendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22542 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-229 Year-2022 Thana- CHANDI District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Ramu Yadav @ Jitendra Kumar S/O Raj Kumar Singh @ Shadhu Singh @ Jay Kumar Singh R/O Village- Ramdihal Tola, P.S- Chandi, Distt.- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prabhat Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Braj Kishore Pd.(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 180 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. It is alleged that 180 liters wine is recovered by the side of Aahar. The name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of disclosure made by local Chowkidar. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22542 of 2023(2) dt.17-05-2023 2/2 of the petitioner in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the order dated 13.04.2022 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No. 626 of 2022 (Sweta Kumari versus State of Bihar). On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R./complaint case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.

10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below/concerned Court in connection with Chandi P.S. case No. 229 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.