Shobha Devi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.56725 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2015 Thana- SAHODARA District- West Champaran ======================================================

1. Shobha Devi Wife of late Arbind Panjiyar,

2. Vishwa Pratap Panjiyar son of late Arbind Panjiyar Both are residents of Village-Dewad, Police Station-Sahodra, District-West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Brij Kishor Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 22-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners want to renew their prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected thrice vide order dated 08.04.2016, 23.11.2016 and 26.07.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 6734 of 2016, 49319 of 2016 and 29070 of 2017 respectively, on the ground that the petitioner no. 1 is a lady and petitioner no. 2 is her son and both are in custody since 08.12.2.105 having no specific allegation and as such they deserve sympathetic consideration. The trial has not been concluded within two months as directed by this Court and the trial court has again directed for examination of informant and as such in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded. The petitioners were given

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56725 of 2017(2) dt.22-11-2017 2/2 liberty to renew their prayer of bail.

Learned APP fairly submits that the trial has not been concluded within the time given by this Court. In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioners above named are directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Fast Track Court II, Bettiah, West Champaran in Sessions Trial No. 353 of 2016 arising out of Sahodra P. S. Case No. 81 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioners shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on their part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioners from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T