Patna High CourtCR. MISC./55067/2017bail granted

Pandav Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-20Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55067 of 2017 (2) dt.20-11-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.55067 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -132 Year- 2017 Thana -CHANDAN District- BANKA ======================================================

1. Pandav Kumar Son of Late Jitendra Yadav @ Harendra Yadav Resident of village- Hasanganj, Police Station- Kasim Bazar, District- Munger .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Smt Pushpa Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-11-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Chandan P.S. Case No. 132 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 30(a)(g) and 32(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Allegation is of recovery of 108 litres of Indian made foreign liquor from a car.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and only happens to be driver of the car from which alleged recovery was made. Further he has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 05.09.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55067 of 2017 (2) dt.20-11-2017 the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge -II, Banka, in connection with Chandan P.S. Case No. 132 of 2017, subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T