Patna High CourtMJC/3686/2014disposed

Ganga Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-01-28Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

Patna High Court MJC No.3686 of 2014 (3) dt.28-01-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3686 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 16370 of 2012 ====================================================== Ganga Chaudhary, son of Late Manogi Chaudhary, resident of A/9, Professors Colony, Agariya Bazar, P.O. Garipur, P.S. Kazimohammadpur, District- Muzaffarpur, at present Budhan Vihar Adarsh Nagar, Road No.1, P.O. & P.S. Phulwarisharif, Patna ,.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar , through its Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna Mr. Anjani Kumar Singh

2. Mr. Deepak Kr. Singh, Commissioner-cum-Secretary ( Principal Secretary, Water Resources , Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. Mr. Shambhu Saran Singh, Under Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

4. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, the Deputy Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

5. Mr. Sushil Kumar Singh, Joint Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

.... .... Opp.Parties.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pranav Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raj Nandan Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-01-2015 Heard.

The present petition has been filed with a prayer to initiate contempt proceeding against Opp.Parties on an allegation of wilful disobedience to an order dated 19.11.2013 passed in C.W.J.C.No.16370 of 2012. By the said order, the writ petition was disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file representation before the concerned authority and, thereafter, the authority was directed to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law.

Patna High Court MJC No.3686 of 2014 (3) dt.28-01-2015 In this case, a show cause has been filed and along with show cause, a reasoned order has been brought on record as Annexure-A to the show cause.

Keeping in view the fact that in compliance with the order of the writ court, a reasoned order has been passed, the Court is of the opinion that there is no need to keep the matter pending. The petition stands disposed of with an indication that if the petitioner feels aggrieved with the order dated 11.12.2014 passed by the Joint Secretary, Water Resources Department, i.e. Annexure-A to the show cause, he would be at liberty to avail appropriate remedy.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) NKS/- U