Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18521/2025rejected

Prakash Singh @ Pappu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-21Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18521 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-206 Year-2024 Thana- PAKRIDAYAL District- East Champaran ====================================================== Prakash Singh @ Pappu Singh Son of Shambhu Sharan Singh Resident of Village- Dulma, P.S.- Madhuban, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 21-07-2025 Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Pakridayal P.S. Case No. 206 of 2024, F.I.R. dated 16.08.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 105, 352, 3(5) of BNS Act.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he operated the hydrocele of the informant's brother and due to his negligence, the informant's brother died.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18521 of 2025(6) dt.21-07-2025 2/2 committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R.

5. Learned APP for the State, on the other hand, on the basis of material available on record as well as case diary, opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that it has come during investigation that the petitioner has operated the hydrocele of the deceased and due to negligence of the doctor, the informant's brother died.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts that there is direct and specific allegation against the petitioner in the F.I.R. supported by the investigation, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with Pakridayal P.S. Case No. 206 of 2024 pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari.

7. Prayer is refused.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T