Patna High CourtL.P.A/1009/2014disposed

Anita Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-03-23Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1009 of 2014 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 21389 of 2012 Along with Interlocutory Application No.5168 of 2014 =========================================================== Anita Singh, Wife of Damodar Singh, resident of Village- Kalyanpur Dhaura, P.O.- Banjari, P.S.- Rohtas, District- Rohtas.

.... .... Petitioner- Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The District Magistrate, Rohtas.

3. The Sub- Divisional Officer, Dehri- on-sone, District- Rohtas.

4. The Child Development Project Officer, Rohtas Block, District- Rohtas.

5. The Block Development Officer, Rohtas, District- Rohtas.

6. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Samhauta, P.S- Rohtas, District- Rohtas.

7. The Panchayat Secretary, P.S., Block & District- Rohtas.

8. Savita Devi Wife of Vinod Kumar Gupta resident of Village- Lahura, P.S.- Rohtas, District- Rohtas.

.... .... Responddents-Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Sourendra Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Balram Kapri, AC to SC-26 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 23-03-2017 Re.: Interlocutory Application No.5168 of 2014 The Interlocutory Application has been filed to condone the delay of 69 days in filing of the Letters Patent Appeal. The delay in filing of the appeal is condoned.

Re.: Letters Patent Appeal No. 1009 of 2014 The learned Writ Court has dismissed the writ application

Patna High Court LPA No.1009 of 2014 dt.23-03-2017 2/2 primarily on the basis of an enquiry conducted by the District Magistrate and holding that the finding of fact recorded by the District Magistrate is not belied and there is no reason to disbelieve the same, has refused to interfere into the matter. The learned Writ Court having upheld the finding of fact recorded by the District Magistrate, we see no reason to interfere into the matter. The Letters Patent Appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) Sunil/- AFR/NAFR N. A. F. R.

CAV DATE N. A.

Uploading Date 28.03.2017 Transmission Date