Dhananjay Prasad @ Dhananjay Prasad Soni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL REVISION No.239 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-185 Year-2018 Thana- BASANTPUR District- Siwan ====================================================== Dhananjay Prasad @ Dhananjay Prasad Soni Son Of Motilal Sah R/O Village- Karahi Khurd, P.S.- Basantpur, District- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Harendra Sah Son Of Late Ram Nath Sah R/O Village- Karahi Khurd, P.S.- Basantpur, District- Siwan 3.

Uttam Kumar Son Of Harendra Sah R/O Village- Karahi Khurd, P.S.- Basantpur, District- Siwan 4.

Anup Kumar Son Of Harendra Sah R/O Village- Karahi Khurd, P.S.- Basantpur, District- Siwan 5.

Ajeet Kumar Son Of Harendra Sah R/O Village- Karahi Khurd, P.S.- Basantpur, District- Siwan ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arun, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Akhileshwar Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 27-07-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within two weeks from today.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner is aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the order dated 14.02.2022 by which the learned Sessions Judge, Siwan has refused to allow the application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. filed on behalf of the informant-petitioner.

At the fag end of the matter when the case was fixed for hearing an application was filed on behalf of the informant requesting the court to allow him to prove the injury reports which

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.239 of 2022(2) dt.27-07-2022 2/2 were allegedly prepared by the higher centre at Gorakhpur. The informant admits that he had not produced those injury reports before the investigating officer and it was his fault. The learned Sessions Judge has recorded in the impugned order that in fact the case records would show that PW6 Dr. Sonelal Rai has been examined who has proved the injury report as well as the supplementary injury report of Dhananjay Singh. The learned court has also recorded that the injury reports which have been exhibited nowhere show that the said injured was referred to any higher centre for better treatment. On the face of the materials available on the record showing that the injury report and the supplementary injury reports have been duly exhibited in course of trial by P.W.-6, this Court finds no reason to interfere with the impugned order. This application has, thus, no merit. It is dismissed accordingly.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) arvind/- U T Note: The ordersheet duly signed has been attached with the record. However, in view of the present arrangements, during Pandemic period all concerned shall act on the basis of the copy of the order uploaded on the High Court website under the heading 'Judicial Orders Passed During The Pandemic Period'.