Suranjan Ram @ Suranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19064 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-559 Year-2024 Thana- BARUN District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Suranjan Ram @ Suranjan Kumar Son of Ram Kumar Ram @ Ram Pukar Ram Resident of village -Basdiha Khurd, Police Station - Phesar, District - Aurangabad (Bihar).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Kamlendra Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State .
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 105 & 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. As per written report of informant namely Deepak Kumar Rai, who is an A.S.I. of Barun Police Station, an F.I.R. was lodged against seven accused persons including this
2/4 petitioner wherein it is alleged that on 12.11.2024 at 12 noon, a dead-body of unknown person was found lying near Pokhrahi Devi Mandir wrapped in a cloth marked with 'Rashtriya Swasth Mission, Bihar, Aurangabad'. It is further alleged that the accused persons named in the F.I.R. carried two unknown patients, who were in unconscious condition, in a government ambulance, bearing registration no. BR01PJ-9752, and dropped them in a deserted place and later on, one of them died.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is quite innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case only on suspicion. At the relevant time, petitioner was working as Strecher Man (IV Grade Staff ) on contract basis and was duty bound to obey the order of high officials and as per job description, petitioner has got no concern with the admission of patients in hospital or in case, patients are referred to a higher centre. Informant is not eye-witness to the occurrence . As a matter of fact, after recovery of the dead-body of the alleged patient, a U.D. Case No. 34 of 2024 was lodged on 14.11.2024 and the dead-body was sent for post-mortem examination. During investigation of the U.D. case, the villagers told that some persons came in Ambulance and disposed the dead-body near Devi Mandir of village Pokhrahi. In CCTV footage, it was
3/4 found that one ambulance came near village Pokhrahi from the side of Siris More. It has also come during course of investigation that two unknown patients were referred for better treatment to the Sadar Hospital, Aurangabad and on the instruction and direction of co-accused Kumar Ashutosh Singh, Deputy Superintendent of Sadar Hospital, Aurangabad, two patients of unsound mind were dispatched through the Government Ambulance and dropped at a deserted place and petitioner has got no role in the entire episode. Petitioner has been made accused in this case merely because at the relevant time, he was posted as Strecher Man (IV Grade Staff ). Petitioner claims clean antecedent. Similarly situated coaccused persons have already granted bail by this Hon'ble Court vide order dated 24.03.2025 in Cr. Misc. No. 9867 of 2025 . 5 . Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition .
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Aurangabad in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 559
4/4 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T