Manoj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2244 of 2018 (2) dt.17-01-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2244 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -487 Year- 2016 Thana -BARACHATTI(MOHANPUR0 District- GAYA ====================================================== Manoj Yadav S/o Govind Yadav, R/o Village- Demo Tola Baragama, P.S.- Mohanpur, District- Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Javed Aslam, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 17-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 23.10.2017 in connection with Barachatti (Mohanpur) P.S. Case No. 487 of 2016 for the alleged offences under Sections 147, 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and in any event the accusations are general and omnibus in nature. No specific accusation of assault nor any allegation of theft has been attributed to the petitioner. The petitioner has earlier been granted anticipatory bail by the Court below, but he was unable to furnish bail bond within the stipulated time.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Barachatti

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2244 of 2018 (2) dt.17-01-2018 (Mohanpur) P.S. Case No. 487 of 2016 on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U T