Chanchal Kumar Yadav @ Chanchal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18020 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-345 Year-2019 Thana- NAWADA MUFFASIL District- Nawada ====================================================== 1.

CHANCHAL KUMAR YADAV @ CHANCHAL KUMAR S/o Rajendra Yadav Resident of Village-Akounadih, P.S.-Muffasil, District-Nawada. 2.

Sonu Yadav @ Sonu Kumar S/o Mundrika Yadav Resident of VillageAkounadih, P.S.-Muffasil, District-Nawada. 3.

Mundrika Yadav S/o Govind Yadav Resident of Village-Akounadih, P.S.- Muffasil, District-Nawada.

4.

Anita Devi @ Parmila Devi W/o Mundrika Yadav Resident of VillageAkounadih, P.S.-Muffasil, District-Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sheo Kumar Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Abhay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-07-2020 Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being taken up by way of virtual Court proceeding.

The matter has been listed under the heading 'For Orders' under the orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 354, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation is that the accused persons including the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18020 of 2020(2) dt.16-07-2020 2/3 petitioners armed with lathi, danda and khanti came and assaulted the informant and when his wife came, they pusher her and when his brother tried to pacify the matter, the accused persons assaulted by khanti on his head.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. It is a case and counter case between the parties. From perusal of the F.I.R., it is evident that there is land dispute between the parties.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and also the lockdown, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on their personal bond to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Muffasil P.S. case No.345 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioners will furnish bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18020 of 2020(2) dt.16-07-2020 3/3 two sureties of the like amount each within a period of seven weeks to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T