Golu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19837 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2025 Thana- SONEBARSA District- Buxar ====================================================== Golu Kumar S/o Sri Ramawtar Pasi R/o Village - Pipradh, Post - Kadsar, P.S - Sonvarsha, District - Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Ms. Dimpal Kumari, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-04-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 218(1), 109(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S..
3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that this petitioner inflicted knife blow on the left side of stomach of informant due to which his intestines came out.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. As a matter of fact, due to petty dispute, a simple altercation took place between the parties in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19837 of 2026(2) dt.07-04-2026 2/2 Petitioner claims clean antecedents.
5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and there is specific accusation that he inflicted knife blow on the left side of stomach of informant due to which his intestine came out. Doctor has found the injury grievous in nature.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, specific and direct nature of accusation and gravity of offence, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T