← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16824/2020disposed

Munna Ravidas v. The State Of Bihar

2020-09-15Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16824 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-157 Year-2016 Thana- NAWADA MUFFASIL District- Nawada ====================================================== MUNNA RAVIDAS, S/o Arvind Ravidas, Resident of Village-Mahanandpur, P.S.-Deepnagar, District-Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Deepak Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dilip Kumar No.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 15-09-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual court proceeding. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 406/420/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Prosecution case in brief is that the accused persons including the petitioner cheated Rs. 1,66,500/- (Rs. One lac sixty-six thousand and five hundred) from the informant and others in the name of giving more interest in depositing the said money in a Company.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent, has committed no offence as alleged and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16824 of 2020(3) dt.15-09-2020 2/3 has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the matter has been compromised between the parties. From pare perusal of the FIR, it would be evident that the informant as well as other villagers have deposited their money in the scheme of a company called 'Deo Soft'. The lock in period of their deposit was three years. After completion of 'lock of period', the money deposited by all the depositors along with up to date interest were returned to their account and as such there is no grievance now. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail petition.

In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on provisional bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Muffasil P. S. Case No. 157 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16824 of 2020(3) dt.15-09-2020 3/3 Accordingly, this application is disposed of. However, the court below is directed to enquire whether the informant and other FIR named persons have got money or not, after satisfaction the provisional bail shall be confirmed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) amitkumar/- U T