Pintu Paswan@ Sarvesh Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26618 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2021 Thana- CHAKARANDHA P.S. District- Gaya ====================================================== Pintu Paswan@ Sarvesh Paswan Son of Jawahar Paswan R/vill - Mahurawan, P.S.- Chhakarbandha, Distt- Gaya, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 25-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Chhakarbandha P.S. Case No. 05 of 2021, dated 31.05.2021 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 302/34, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. Prayer of the petitioner for bail was earlier rejected by this Court vide order dated 05.04.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 75542 of 2023.
4. This is the second attempt for grant of bail by the petitioner. Save and except period of custody, nothing has changed and no fresh ground is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner for enlarging the petitioner on bail.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26618 of 2025(2) dt.25-04-2025 2/2
5. Since there is a specific allegation against the petitioner of firing upon deceased who shot the father of the informant on his temporal region, I am not inclined to reconsider the prayer for bail.
6. The learned trial Court is directed to take all endeavour and conclude the trial positively within a period of one year from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. If the trial is not concluded within one year, the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail.
7. With the aforesaid observation, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is once again rejected.
(Khatim Reza, J) Sankalp/- U T