Dhrub Poddar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.36185 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -50 Year- 2016 Thana -KHARAGPUR District- MUNGER ====================================================== Dhrub Poddar Son of Parashuram Poddar, Resident of villageMuzaffarganj, P.S. Kharagpur, District- Munger. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Indu Bhushan, Adv. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 06-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Kharagpur P.S. Case No. 50 of 2016.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in retaliation to Complaint Case No. 273C of 2016 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger by the petitioner's side. The injuries sustained by the informant and Raj Kishore Poddar are simple in nature. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Jitendra Kumar, learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with Kharagpur P.S. Case No. 50 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36185 of 2016 (2) dt.06-09-2016 and also subject to the following further conditions: (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(iii) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/BT U T