Paras Nath Gupta v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Revision No.560 of 2014 Arising Out of Complaint Case No.423C of 2011 District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) =========================================================== Paras Nath Gupta, son of Sri Nageshwar Sah, resident of village Telkap, P.S. Rohtas, Distt. Rohtas.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Kanchan Devi, wife of Paras Nath Gupta and daughter of Brihaspati Sah

3. Brihaspati Sah @ Brihaspati Sao, son of Bilat Sah

4. Kamlelsh Sah @ Kamlesh Sao, son of Bilat Sah.

5. Lalan Kumar, son of Brihaspati Sah Opposite Parties No. 2 to 5 are residents of village Khajuri, P.O. Banjari, P.S. Rohtas, Distt. Rohtas.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajani Kant Singh, Adv. For the State : Mr. M.K. Nirala, A.P.P. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 29-09-2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State. The Petitioner seeks revision of the order dated 26.5.2014 by which the Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram, in Criminal Revision No. 312 of 2012 set aside the order dated 17.7.2012 passed by the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dehri, Disttt. Rohtas.

On going through the impugned order, I find that it was for good reasons that the order of cognizance was set aside and, hence, finding no merit in the application, the same is dismissed. The application stands dismissed.

(Anjana Prakash, J) S.Ali/- U T