Manoj Kumar Sharma @ Manoj Sharma v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20323 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-504 Year-2025 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.
Manoj Kumar Sharma @ Manoj Sharma Son of Late Vashishth Sharma Resident of Village- Andarkila, P.S.- Tekari, District- Gaya Ji 2.
Manju Devi Wife of Manoj Kumar Sharma @ Manoj Sharma Resident of Village- Andarkila, P.S.- Tekari, District- Gaya Ji 3.
Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Sharma Son of Manoj Kumar Sharma @ Manoj Sharma Resident of Village- Andarkila, P.S.- Tekari, District- Gaya Ji 4.
Chanda Kumari @ Chanda Sharma D/o Manoj Kumar Sharma @ Manoj Sharma Resident of Village- Andarkila, P.S.- Tekari, District- Gaya Ji ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Yogesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, A.P.P.
For the Informant :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, informant and the State.
2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 127(2), 190, 191(2), 117(2), 109, 74 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. As per prosecution case, on 26.11.2025 at about 9:30 AM, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, assaulted daughters of the informant as a result of which they sustained head injuries.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20323 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026 2/2 petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus. Doctor has found the injuries to be simple. Petitioner nos. 1, 3 and 4 claim clean antecedent and petitioner no. 2 has got one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the nature of accusation and injuries, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate VI, Gaya Ji in connection with Tekari P. S. Case No. 504 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T