Ajit Kumar @ Shardha Nand Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19768 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-122 Year-2025 Thana- KORANSARAI District- Buxar ====================================================== 1.
Ajit Kumar @ Shardha Nand Singh Son of Shriman Narayan Singh All Are Resident of Village - Nawadih, P.S. - Koransarai, District - Buxar. 2.
Shriman Narayan Singh Son of Late Lalmuni Singh Resident of Village - Nawadih, P.S. - Koransarai, District - Buxar. 3.
Manu Singh Son of Sachitanand Singh Resident of Village - Nawadih, P.S. - Koransarai, District - Buxar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Mohit Shriwastava For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Bhanu Pratap Singh Mr.Abhishek Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 22-04-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned APP for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.
2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 74, 109(1), 303(2), 191(2), 190, 351(2) of the B.N.S.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner nos.1 and 2 have antecedent of one case and petitioner no.3 has antecedent of two cases are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 20.10.2025 at
2/4 8.40 A.M., the accused persons namely, Chandan and Ajit came and started teasing his daughter. On objection, Chandan and Ajit pulled her scarf, accordingly, his daughter came inside the house and when his brother wife and sister in-law came out of the house to enquire, when Sriman Narayan and Sachidanand asked their wives and son to bring rod etc. Further, Chandan assaulted his brother (Suraj) by rod causing injury on head while Mannu and Arvind assaulted by an iron rami causing injury on hand and Dhanmania Devi and Kamla snatched chain and mangalsutra of his wife. Further, when villagers gathered rest women accused pelted stones on the house.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegations as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that no reason for the occurrence is alleged that informant alleges that Ajit and Chandan came and started teasing his daughter on account of which the occurrence is alleged to have taken place, but then the fact is that petitioners and the informant are neighbours and are having dispute relating to passage hence an altercation took place in which both sides assaulted each other. It is also submitted that allegation of eve teasing the daughter of
3/4 the informant is an exaggerated allegation with a view to give seriousness to the case. It is next submitted that no doubt, brother of informant namely Suraj suffered grievous injury on head but then allegation of assaulting him by rod is against Chandan. It is further submitted that as far as petitioners are concerned, the allegation against them is general and omnibus in nature, though Mannu along with Arvind are alleged to have assaulted the brother of the informant by iron rami causing injury on hand but the said injury is opined to be simple in nature. It is also submitted that if privilege of anticipatory bail is granted, petitioners will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove their innocence. It is also submitted that Chandan is not a petitioner in the instant anticipatory bail application.
5. Learned A.P.P. as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant opposes the anticipatory bail application, but then are not in a position to rebut the submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that brother of the informant suffered simple injury on hand and that no reason for the occurrence is alleged as it does not appear probable that on issue of eve teasing the family members of Ajit and Chandan would have supported.
4/4
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on anticipatory bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Koransarai P. S. Case No.122 of 2025, GR No.4038 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T