← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8339/2021dismissed

Reena Raman, v. The State Of Bihar Through The Additional Chief Secretary, Social Welfare Department,

2024-03-01Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8339 of 2021 ====================================================== Reena Raman, Wife of Pankaj Kumar Singh, resident of Village Sadi Salempur Mohanpur, P.S. Goradih, District-Bhagalpur, sevika of Anganbari Center No. 1, Ward No. 01 of Gram panchayat Mohanpur, Block and Anchal Goradih, District Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Manager, Bhagalpur, District-Bhagalpur. 3.

The Director, Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS), Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The District Program Officer, Bhagalpur, District- Bhagalpur. 5.

The Deputy Development Commissioner, Bhagalpur. 6.

The Child Development Project Officer, Bhagalpur. 7.

Neelu Bihari, wife of Prem Shankar Singh, resident of Village Mal Mohanpur, P.S. Goradih, District-Bhagalpur, Sevika of Anganbari Center No. 94, Ward No. 02 of Gram panchayat Mohanpur, Block and Anchal Goradih, District Bhagalpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anuj Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Lalit Kishore, Sr. Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 01-03-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1.A.i. Quashing the order dated 28.12.2020 passed in Miscellaneous (Anganbari) Appeal No. 89 of 2018-19 by the Collector, Bhagalpur whereby and whereunder he was pleased to overrule the order dated 10.04.2018 passed by District Program Officer,

Patna High Court CWJC No.8339 of 2021(6) dt.01-03-2024 2/2 Bhagalpur thereby conforming the shifting order."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a suit before the Ld. Civil Court having competent jurisdiction, for redressal of the aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U