Sudhanshu Kumar @ Mausam @ Mausam Kumar @ Gautam v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40248 of 2013 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -101 Year- 2013 Thana -SASARAM MUFFSIL District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ===========================================================

1. Maya Kuer w/o Late Ashok Singh

2. Sujata Kumari @ Gudia Kumari D/O Late Ashok Singh

3. Sudhakar Kumar @ Mohit Kumar S/O Late Ashok Singh, all Resident Of Village- Mohaddiganj, P.S- Sasaram (M), District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. Poonam Kumari D/O Sri Lakshman Singh, Resident Of Mohalla- Takiya (Purab Patti), P.O- Takiya, P.S- Sasaram, (Modal), District- Rohtas. .... .... Opposite Party/s with =========================================================== Criminal Miscellaneous No. 10551 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -101 Year- 2013 Thana -SASARAM MUFFSIL District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) =========================================================== Sudhanshu Kumar @ Mausam @ Mausam Kumar @ Gautam son of late Ashok Singh, resident of village Mahadiganj, P.S. Sasaram (M), District Rohtas .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Punam Kumari D/O Sri Lakshman Singh, Resident Of Mohalla- Takiya (Purab Patti), P.O- Takiya, P.S- Sasaram Model, District- Rohtas .... .... Opposite Party/s =========================================================== Appearance :

(In Cr.Misc. No. 40248 of 2013) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. M. N. Jha, APP For Opposite Party No.2 : Mr. Chhote Lal, Advocate (In Cr.Misc. No. 10551 of 2014) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP For Opposite Party No.2 : Mr. Chhote Lal, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 02-04-2015 In the nature of dispute between the parties, the matter was

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40248 of 2013 dt.02-04-2015 2/2 referred to the Mediation Centre, where the parties agreed to dissolve the marriage by mutual consent.

The Petitioner of Cr.Misc.No.10551 of 2014 was required to pay a sum of Rs.3,50,000/- to the Opposite Party No.2 as one time settlement. A draft of the aforesaid amount is handed over to the Counsel for the Opposite Party No.2, who signs in the margin of the order sheet in token of receipt of the same.

Considering the amicable settlement, further proceedings of Sasaram (M) P.S. case No.101 of 2013 including the order dated 24.4.2013 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in Sasaram (M) P.S. case No.101 of 2013 is hereby dropped. Also Maintenance case No.42 of 2013 pending before the court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Sasaram is dropped.

The spouses are directed to file an application before the Court below under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of this order, upon which a favourable order shall be passed by the Court below in view of the settlement before this Court.

(Anjana Prakash, J) Narendra/- U T