Manoj Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.2009 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -68 Year- 2009 Thana -JAMALPUR District- MUNGER ====================================================== Manoj Singh, S/o Sri Company Singh, Resident of Village- Rampur, P.S. + Post - Jamalpur, District - Munger.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Shree Ganesh, Advocate For the Opposite Party: Mr. Jitendra Kr. Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 12-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is in custody since 08.02.2016 in connection with S.T. No. 676 of 2014 arising out of Jamalpur P.S. Case No. 68 of 2009 for the offences alleged under Sections 399, 402 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 25(1-b)A, 26/35 of the Arms Act and Sections 3/4 of the Explosive Substances Act.
3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated merely on suspicion and he has not been arrested from the spot. No incriminating articles have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner as there is no material to connect him with the alleged offence. Similarly situated co-accused Kare Singh @ Karaka Singh has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 14905 of 2017 vide order dated 20.04.2017.
4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District Judge-1, Munger in connection with S.T. No. 676 of 2014 arising out of Jamalpur P.S.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2009 of 2018 (2) dt.12-01-2018 2/2 Case No. 68 of 2009, on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(Vikash Jain, J) B.T/Chandran U T