Md. Moti v. The Union Of India Through The Ministry Of Home Affairs, Govt. Of India, New Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17296 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1408 Year-2019 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== MD. MOTI Son of Md. Taslim Resident of Medical Chowk Rasulpur, P.S.- Ahiyapur, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW DELHI New Delhi 2.

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pallava Vijeta For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Surendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 09-06-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 1408 of 2019 registered for the offence under Sections 20 and 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, who is of clean antecedent, is innocent and has not committed any offence. In fact, the co-accused having more or less similar allegation has already been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No.16777 of 2020 and the case of this petitioner stands on similar footing. The petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 30.11.2019.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17296 of 2020(2) dt.09-06-2020 2/2 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and also the lock-down, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of learned Session Court -cum- Special Court, Muzaffarpur in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 1408 of 2019. Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of four weeks to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) brajesh/- U T