Divendra Paswan @ Devendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28994 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2962 Year-2018 Thana- VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE District- Vaishali ====================================================== Divendra Paswan @ Devendra Kumar Son Of Late Ram Chandra Paswan Resident Of Village - Atardah Pokhariya Peer, P.S. - Sadar Bhagwanpur, District - Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Lalita Devi Wife of Devendra Paswan @ Devendra Kumar Sadar, District - Vaishali ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Alok Kumar Alok For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 01-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Though the Vakalatnama has been filed by the opposite party no. 2 but nobody appears on her behalf.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the DP Act. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28994 of 2021(4) dt.01-08-2022 2/2 implicated in this case. He submits that the matter has been settled between the parties and the petitioner is ready to pay Rs. 1.50 lakh in which he has paid Rs. 1 lakh to the opposite party no. 2. He submits that the rest amount i.e. 50,000/- will be paid on 28.08.2022 to the opposite party no. 2. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Complaint Case No. 2962 of 2018, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T