Sumit Kumar @ Sumit Sinha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19897 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-592 Year-2015 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== SUMIT KUMAR @ SUMIT SINHA Son of Late Sanjay Kumar Sinha Resident of Village - Ashok Nagar, Ward no.8, P.s.- Kankarbagh, Distt.- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rohit Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 20-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420 and 406/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Prosecution case in short is that one Gaurav Verma got booked a plot on payment of Rs.72,000/- and thereafter entered into the agreement with the said company and paid Rs. 4,47,000/- and thereafter according to agreement he paid Rs. 5,90,000/- through cheque but the official of said company started evading from registry and the company transferred Rs.5,03,000 to the informant but according to agreement the company has to give Rs.3,25,000/- for which the cheque has been given but the same bounced owing to which the informant got mental trauma.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19897 of 2022(2) dt.20-09-2022 2/2 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that good sense has prevailed between the parties as evident from Annexure-2 to this petition and in respect of money settled, no grievance present remained which is also evident from Annexure-2 to the present petition. Petitioner has clean antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner, above named in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 592 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T